There have been numerous distortions, omissions, and lies spewn by the Department of Human Services since this case started. I have selected a small taste of these, to illustrate just what kind of corruption we're dealing with.

1.) During a hearing on Friday, May 5th, PATRICIA POINTED OUT THAT THE AMBULANCE DRIVERS' REP0RT DID NOT
MATCH WHAT THE DHS HAD REPORTED TO THE COURT.
FOR ONE THING, THE AMBULANCE DRIVERS REPORTED A STAIN ON THE MATTRESS, AND THAT GRANDMA HAD BEEN VOMITING, HAD SOME ON HER (AND SHE DID HAVE SOME
IT IN HER HAIR...SHE HAS LONG HAIR!...ANYONE WITH LONG HAIR UNDERSTANDS THIS!)...AND OF COURSE, SHE HAD DIARREAH AS WELL...SHE DOES SUFFER FROM INCONTENANCE...

>>>NOW, IN THE AFFIDAVIT FILED ON JAN 13TH BY DHS WORKER PAULA WALZER, SHE SAID,"THE AMBULANCE STAFF WENT INTO THE HOME FOUND MS. STENLUND LAYING IN FECES
AND URINE.  THE MATTRESS WAS SOAKED WITH FECES AND URINE."  <<<1ST LIE!

2.) IN THE DHS' OWN REPORT, (WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED BY LOOKING AT THE EXHIBITS FOR CASE# GC 54739) THEY QUOTE PART OF THE AMBULANCE DRIVERS'S REPORT...AND YET, AT THE END OF THE REPORT WHERE THEY MAKE THEIR FINDING, THEY STATE AS "FACTOR 3":
"MS. WILSON ALLOWED HER MOTHER TO CONTINUALLY LAY IN HER OWN URINE AND FECES WITH VOMIT ON HER BODY AND IN HER HAIR." <<<2ND LIE!
(KEEP IN MIND THAT THE AMBULANCE REPORT SAYS NOTHING OF THE SORT...AND, SHE WAS AT MY HOUSE JUST 3 DAYS EARLIER FOR CHRISTMAS DINNER...AND WE DON'T PERMIT OUR GUESTS TO COME INTO OUR HOME WITH VOMIT, FECES, OR URINE ON THEM!!!

3.) A THIRD INTERSTING FACT ABOUT THIS CASE IS A SUSPISCIOUS OMISSION WE FOUND IN THIS SAME REPORT...UNDER THE HEADING OF:
12/29/2005, THE DHS QUOTES THE AMBULANCE DRIVER'S REPORT.  IT STARTS OUT ACCURATE, BUT RIGHT AFTER THE WORDS, "PULSE 120S REGULAR" THERE IS: "....."
<<<HERE THEY LEFT OUT TWO VERY IMPORTANT SENTENCES! THEY ARE: "25MG PHENEGRAN GIVEN IM FOR n/v. PT AVPU DURING ASSESSMENT AND MED ADMIN." <<<HERE THEY LEAVE OUT THE FACT THAT GRANDMA WAS GIVEN PHENEGRAN, AND THAT SHE WAS CONSCIOUS DURING THE ADMINISTRATION OF IT!  WHY??? BECAUSE, PHENEGRAN (A MEDICATION GIVEN TO TREAT NAUSEA) HAS THE SIDE-EFFECT OF CAUSING CONFUSION AND EVEN DELIRIUM ESPECIALLY IN OLDER PATIENTS...AND, IT CAN TAKE A DAY OR TWO TO WEAR OFF COMPLETELY (THERE IS EVEN AN ENTRY ABOUT THIS IN THE HOSPITAL RECORDS)
...ALSO, THE FACT THAT SHE WAS UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF A DRUG ADMINISTERED BY THE EMT'S WOULD WEAKEN THE POSITION OF THE DHS, SINCE IT WOULD EXPLAIN HER BEING "OUT OF IT" AT THE HOSPITAL.

>>>IN THE FIRST AFFIDAVIT FILED BY PAULA WALZER, SHE STATES THAT "EMERGENCY MEDICAL STAFF BELIEVED THAT SHE WAS IN FACT DEAD WHEN THEY ARRIVED AT HER HOME.<<<NOT TRUE!!!  IN THE AMBULANCE DRIVERS' REPORT,

THEY SAID THAT "INITIALLY, THE PATIENT DID NOT APPEAR TO BE BREATHING (SHE WAS EXPERIENCING SOME SHALLOWNESS OF BREATH)...FURTHERMORE, IF YOU LOOK AT THE DHS REPORT ONCE
AGAIN, YOU SEE UNDER THE FIRST HEADING OF 12/28/2005: "THE NURSE INDICATED THAT MS. STENLUND'S BLOODPRESSURE WAS FLUCTUATING, BUT SHE DID NOT GIVE THE IMPRESSION SHE WAS NEAR DEATH."  <<<THAT IS A MERCY NURSE AS QUOTED IN THE DHS REPORT!!!  THEIR OWN REPORT!!! NOW, TALK ABOUT SOME INCOMPETENT "INVESTIGATORS"!

THESE ARE JUST A FEW OF THE MORE OBVIOUS CONTRADICTIONS IN THEIR CASE...WE HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND THAT WE CAN'T PUBLICIZE THEM ALL AT THIS TIME. I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT WHILE THE SOURCE OF THESE LIES AND DISTORTIONS IS THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, THE COUNTY ATTORNEY HAS SIGNED OFF ON THE PETITIONS WHICH ACCOMPANIED THE SWORN AFFIDAVITS WITH THE AFORE MENTIONED INFORMATION. IT IS HIS RESPONSIBILITY TO KNOW THE FACTS OF THE CASE, AND TO NOT ADMIT PERJURED TESTIMONY TO THE COURT...SUCH AN ACT IS A BREACH OF ETHICS, AND IS AGAINST THE LAW. ANY ONE WHO SIMPLY READS ALL OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE FILE, CAN AND WILL SEE THE CONTRADICTIONS WE'VE MENTIONED, AND WILL UNDOUBTEDLY FIND MORE.

THOSE IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, AND OTHERS WHO'S POWER INFLUENCES THE LIVES OF SO MANY, MUST EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION. IT IS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO SEE TO IT THAT JUSTICE IS DONE. THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL ARE PARAMOUNT IF WE ARE TO HAVE A TRULY FREE SOCIETY...ANYTHING LESS IS UNACCEPTABLE.